AAFCO and Pet Food Regulations

AAFCO and Pet Food Regulations

One aspect of pet food that many dog owners have questions about is regulation: who is responsible for monitoring the safety and nutritional accuracy of pet food products? Some pet owners and stores believe that AAFCO, The Association of American Feed Control Officials is responsible for approving pet foods but in fact this isn’t the case. Here are a few facts and examples of what AAFCO does and does not do, to help clarify the situation.

AAFCO Does not Regulate Feeds or Pet Products

The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) is responsible for regulating pet foods. The FDA monitors food branding to make certain that labels are not misleading, and that the manufacturer is recorded on the label. Pet food processing plants may also be inspected by the FDA although many manufacturers will voluntarily recall their products before FDA involvement to limit the bad press that might accompany any deaths or illness from tainted products.

AAFCO is a Private Organization, Not a Government Regulatory Agency

AAFCO is a voluntary organization, which is comprised largely of regulatory officials who have responsibility for enforcing their state’s laws and regulations concerning the safety of animal feeds. According to the FDA, “AAFCO is vital to the continued regulation of pet food products because FDA has limited enforcement resources that are focused on human food safety issues.”

AAFCO states that it has been formed to protect the consumer. Despite being composed of many regulatory officials, AAFCO as an organization has no means of enforcement, nor do they perform any analytical testing of foods. Regardless, AAFCO’s regulations are adopted by most states and are the standard to which pet and livestock feed manufacturers must adhere.

AAFCO Devises Pet Food and Feed Labeling Guidelines

AAFCO endeavors to protect the consumer through labeling requirements, ingredient requirements and nutritional requirements. Any dog food manufacturer that wants to make the claim that their food is ‘nutritionally complete’ must meet AAFCO’s nutritional requirements, feeding trial requirements, or produce a food similar to one which has met these requirements.

The nutrient profiles set forth by AAFCO list minimum and maximum levels of intake for protein, fat, vitamin and mineral content of foods. The level of nutrients is expressed on a ‘dry matter’ basis. The levels of nutrients listed in the guaranteed analysis on the pet food label are expressed on an 'as fed' basis. To convert 'as fed' to 'dry matter' the consumer must do some calculations. If a dry food has 10% moisture it will have 90% dry matter. If protein matter is listed as 20% on the pet food label, you must divide the 20% protein by the 90% dry matter to calculate the amount of protein on a dry matter basis.

The nutrient profiles were originally based on minimum nutrient requirements established by the National Research Council Committee on Animal Nutrition (NRC) in 1991. In 1995, AAFCO changed these standards to incorporate ‘new scientific information’ completed by the pet food manufacturers. One such change was to lower the minimum protein content from 22% to 18% which is noteworthy as protein is the most expensive ingredient on the dog food label.

The source of food nutrients is not regulated by AAFCO. Protein can be derived any source. As long as it is protein, it meets AAFCO nutritional standards. Bioavailability and digestibility of nutrients is not a consideration for AAFCO.

AAFCO Establishes Feed Grade Definitions

AAFCO regulations state that a pet food manufacturer must provide not only a guaranteed analysis on the food label, but a list of ingredients presented in descending order with the ingredient with the most weight listed first. This nutrient listing is a common source of confusion to the consumer as protein is further divided into meat meal, meat digest, fat meal, bone meal and animal by-product meal (instead of beef muscle meat, chicken beaks, pig ligaments, blood, intestines, and the infamous 4-D meats – dead, dying, diseased and disabled). Manufacturers can further confuse the consumer by ‘splitting’ less nutritional such as corn or wheat to move the ingredient down the list. For example, by dividing corn into corn, corn bran, corn germ meal, corn gluten, corn gluten meal and corn syrup, a manufacturer can produce a food that is perhaps 50% corn and 10% chicken appear to have chicken as the main ingredient by splitting the corn into the above ingredients, effectively moving it down the list of ingredients.

AAFCO Establishes Guidelines For Feeding Trials

In addition to establishing pet food labeling regulations and ingredient definitions, AAFCO formulates protocols for feeding trials. AAFCO does not provide any oversight of their studies, rather they set the guidelines that they suggest pet food companies follow as a standard practice to prove their foods are nutritionally complete. AAFCO states that a minimum of eight healthy dogs are required for one trial and that the trial must last a minimum of 26 weeks where only one formulation of food is tested and is the sole source of nutrition (except for water).

A traditional AAFCO feeding trial takes place in a testing facility / test kennel. Food consumption may be measure and recorded. Test subjects’ bodyweights, as well as hemoglobin, packed cell volume, serum alkaline phosphatase and serum albumin are measured. If these are all within normal ranges and six dogs have survived for six months on the food, the formulation will be determined as nutritionally complete.

Feeding trials are not commonly performed due to expense, so AAFCO allows pet food manufacturers to claim their food as nutritionally complete if one of the following requirements is met:

  • The food meets the nutrient requirements of the nutrient profile
  • The food is similar to a food that a product that meets nutrient requirements of the nutrient profile.

Going Above the AAFCO Standard Feeding Trial

While AAFCO sets a standard for the minimum requirements for a feeding trial, some brands, like us here at The Honest Kitchen, see that as the starting point—not the finish line. When we conducted our feeding trial, we not only met AAFCO guidelines, we exceeded them.

To provide what we believe is a better experience and wellbeing for the dogs, we conducted the trial in their homes, rather than at a kennel. We also added additional guidelines to test for overall nutritional adequacy and wellbeing.

Meeting AAFCO Standards is Just One Part of The Equation

Most consumers want to feed their dog a product that is not only nutritionally balanced and complete, but does not contain substances which are potentially harmful for their dogs. AAFCO helps provide guidelines to show that a food is balanced to meet the nutritional needs for your dog, but it does not set ingredient or quality standards.

When comparing different pet food brands, it's important to weigh all elements that are looking to you in a pet food: what percent of protein is coming from a high-quality source (whole muscle and organ meat vs a meat meal); how much corn, wheat or soy is in the overall makeup of the product; what are the health and safety measures put in place during production; and more.

Brandy Vachal

Brandy Vachal Moore is a dog mom to three pint-sized dogs: Donnatella the Maltese, Ernie the Yorkie-Maltese mix and Rico the Chihuahua. When she’s not defending her personal space from three dogs who know no boundaries. Brandy enjoys anything fitness related, traveling, hiking, and being outdoors in the San Diego sunshine. She loves all things social media and journalism and has worked for The Honest Kitchen for the past 5 years.
Back to Blog